The debt ceiling is being used a negotiating tool in American politics yet again. My concern with American politics is that most things seem to be over-dramatised, while some disturbing things are shoved under the carpet. The debt ceiling is a great source of hysterics from south of the border. My highly non-informed take is that this debt ceiling drama will end in the usual way, going to the 11th hour before some kind of deal is struck.
Default Of Currency Sovereigns
I discussed default risk of sovereigns with floating currencies (“currency sovereigns”) in Understanding Government Finance. The formula that I have settled on: floating currency sovereigns are immune to involuntary default for financial reasons. This is not “floating currency governments cannot default,” rather “the so-called ‘bond vigilantes’ cannot force such a government to default.”
The “floating currency” qualifier is important. If a country borrows in a currency it does not control (e.g. euro), or a foreign currency (e.g., countries borrowing in a hard currency), or pegs its currency to another instrument (gold, another currency), it can be forced to default. If you look at your databases of sovereign defaults, those are the bulk of the cases. There is also the corner case where a country has both local and foreign currency debt, and defaults on both.
Once we exclude those cases — which is the case for most of the post-Bretton Woods developed countries that are not in the euro — we still have some possible reasons for default that are not for involuntary financial reasons.
- Hypothetically, there could be incompetence in making a payment. However, there is a grace period before default is declared, so this one is a stretch.
- Involuntary non-financial reasons: losing a war, some natural disaster taking out the domestic payments system. (Kuwait did not default in 1990 because of “bond vigilantes”).
- Voluntary default because the debt is seen as “odious” — debt run up by a previous regime that is seen as illegitimate.
- Voluntary default for ideological reasons: radical legislators (e.g., commies or libertarians) default in an attempt to destroy the financial/capitalist system.
The recurring debt ceiling crisis is about the last risk in the list: radicals in power want to force a default.
Why Default Was Generally Avoided
The U.S. has managed to avoid a serious debt crisis despite the recurring debt ceiling dramas. (There was a hiccup in 1979, but it was papered over quickly.) The reason is straightforward: most American politicians do not want to have to explain to their donors why they cratered the financial system. Somebody finally caves in on something to break whatever impasse there was in negotiations.
Will this time be different? Although I recognise that the latest crop of Republican lawmakers is even more radical than previous ones, my guess is that there are still enough Republicans with a sense of self-preservation that a deal would be struck at some point ahead of a default.
The Coin?
Although minting high denomination platinum coins appears to be a legal way to break the impasse over the debt ceiling, the White House is clearly not excited about the prospect. Establishment Democrats include a lot of of fiscal conservatives who do not mind the debt ceiling theatrics. The rest of the establishment is probably relying on “normalcy bias”: various gimmicks used to stretch out the time for negotiations worked in the past, so why will this time be different?
Past precedent is that they would only look at The Coin as the very last possibility, and it will be a long time to get that stage. The fact that some Democrats are calling for the Platinum Coin gives President Biden a useful negotiating tool — he is not threatening to mint the coin himself, but he has colleagues who are willing to do so. This gives the President a lot of leverage — since his ultimate threat overrides the threat of default.
Concluding Remarks
It is safe to say that the debt ceiling drama will go on for a long time. I could be horribly wrong and there be a default, but I would still lean towards the “last minute” negotiated solution.
The whole “debt ceiling” contretemps is a manufactured crisis which relies upon the ignorance of the electorate where fiat monetary operations and monetary sovereign budgets are concerned. It lets both parties sling mud at the other by implying it’s their opponents who are fiscal reprobates, while they are rock-ribbed defenders of the public purse manning the ramparts against the vandals who are threatening future generations. It’s all lies and both parties are complicit, which is why it will only end when the electorate realizes that the “household budget analogy” is fallacious.
ReplyDeleteNot holding my breath …
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete